The molecular chain of waterborne polyurethane resin is generally linear or branched, and the strength of the film without crosslinking is lower. In order to improve the water resistance, chemical resistance, high temperature resistance and mechanical properties of the cured film, it is necessary to appropriately increase the degree of crosslinking during the synthesis of the resin, or insert some crosslinkable groups, or add some crosslinking. It can produce enough cross-linking during curing to form a film to form an interpenetrating network system or a polymerized cross-linking system to meet various requirements.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit our website.
The cross-linking modification of waterborne polyurethane can be divided into internal cross-linking and external cross-linking. It is a method of cross-linking linear molecular chains into a network structure through a chemical cross-linking modification method to improve the water resistance of the material.
Internal crosslinking modification usually selects a trifunctional or higher alcohol instead of diol, or selects a trifunctional or higher isocyanate to replace part of the diisocyanate as raw materials to produce a certain degree of crosslinking and branching waterborne polyurethane.
The external cross-linking method is equivalent to a two-component system, that is, adding the cross-linking agent component to the water-based polyurethane main agent before use. During the film formation or heating after the formation, a chemical reaction occurs to form a cross-linked film.
Compared with the internal cross-linking method, the obtained emulsion through external method has good performance. Besides, the performance of the film can be adjusted according to the variety and dosage of different cross-linking agents. The disadvantage is that it needs to be configured before use and has a limited pot life.
There are two types of isocyanate crosslinkers used in waterborne polyurethanes, hydrophobic and hydrophilic.
Hydrophobic isocyanates such as HDI trimers, IDI trimers, and IPDI trimers are added to waterborne polyurethane and must be dispersed under high shear.
The hydrophilic modified aliphatic polyisocyanate is easier to disperse in water, and the polyisocyanate can be more uniformly dispersed by mechanical mixing. This water-dispersible polyisocyanate has become the main crosslinking agent of waterborne polyurethane and is used as the room temperature crosslinking component of two-component waterborne polyurethane coatings and adhesives.
Dispersible polyisocyanate crosslinking agent products are mainly aliphatic, because aliphatic polyisocyanates react very slowly with water, leaving active NCO to react with the hydroxyl groups in the film during the film formation process. These polyisocyanate crosslinkers are generally 100% non-volatile liquid polyisocyanate products, and a few are organic solutions of polyisocyanates, with solvents such as butyl acetate and dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether.
The general addition amount is 1%-5%, and the pot life is 4-6 hours. Adding too much will cause the film to be harder, and it needs to be sealed and stored.
The aziridine (aziridine) can react with carboxyl and hydroxyl groups at room temperature. Compounds with multiple aziridine rings are suitable as carboxylic acid type waterborne polyurethane crosslinkers, mainly to improve water resistance.
There are such products at home and abroad. It is added to waterborne polyurethane and mainly reacts with carboxyl groups. Generally, it should be used up within 24 hours. It can also self-polymerize under acidic conditions. The general dosage is 1%-4%.
However, aziridine compounds are toxic, have ammonia odor, and are expensive. It is relatively stable under alkaline conditions. Some people believe that adding aziridine to alkaline emulsions to form an internal cross-linking system can be cross-linked by controlling the pH of the emulsion.
Polycarbodiimide crosslinking agent is a light yellow transparent liquid, which can improve the adhesion to special substrates. Polycarbodiimide can be used as room temperature crosslinking of carboxylic acid type waterborne polyurethane, etc., and can exist stably in PU emulsion, and its crosslinking reaction is carried out by acid catalysis.
Due to the volatilization of water and neutralizer during the drying process of the coating film, the pH value in the film will decrease, which provides conditions for the occurrence of cross-linking reaction. The dosage is generally 5%-10%, and some are even less, and the pot life is about 12 hours.
Compared with aziridine cross-linking agent, polycarbodiimide does not affect the yellowing property. Common carbodiimide crosslinking agents are difficult to disperse in water, and can be modified with PEG to make them easy to disperse.
In addition, there are crosslinking agents such as epoxy compounds, epoxy silanes, N-methylol compounds, and polyamines.
Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) consist of polyurethane particles dispersed in water with the aid of an organic solvent or a dispersing agent. These dispersions have good film formation and provide superior appearance and resistance properties.1 They are also free of isocyanate residues and can be formulated at low VOC levels, both of which make them safer to use than their solvent-based counterparts. While these advantages are desired by formulators, the usage of PUDs has been limited by their cost, which is sometimes higher than conventional acrylic emulsions. To offset the cost, PUDs can be combined with acrylic emulsions through a physical blend2 or a chemical reaction, resulting in a PUD-acrylic hybrid.3 In this study, we have evaluated the performance of a PUD-acrylic hybrid, Joncryl® HYB , as a high-performance wood coating using added crosslinkers to improve the crosslink density in the film. The objective of the study is to evaluate how crosslinkers affect properties and which crosslinker would provide the best performance in a PUD-based wood coating. In addition, the mechanism of crosslinking will be investigated.4
Crosslinking is the process of chemically joining two or more polymer chains by covalent bonds and is usually initiated by heat, pressure or change in pH. Increasing the crosslink density of a coating forms an impenetrable barrier that prevents water and chemicals from reaching the substrate. This results in improved chemical resistance. Crosslinking also augments adhesion and scratch resistance, thereby providing a tougher coating with overall better performance properties.5 Crosslinking is usually done by using external crosslinkers such as isocyanates, aziridines, melamines, polycarbodiimide (PCDI), etc. Table 1 shows the different functional groups on a polymer backbone that could react with a crosslinker.
Functional groups like amines or alcohols are nucleophilic6 and react readily with crosslinkers.7 Carboxylic acids are not as nucleophilic and react much slower.8 The Joncryl HYB is not OH or amine functional. We are therefore relying upon two different mechanisms for the resin to react with external crosslinkers, shown in Figure 1.
Since Joncryl HYB is not OH functional, the crosslinker may not react with it at all. Instead, there is a reaction between the crosslinker and water to form an interpenetrating network.9 This network of crosslinker formed within the framework of the PUD increases the crosslink density and thereby improves performance. In the second potential mechanism, the crosslinker could react with the carboxylic acid functionality on the PUD to form a crosslinked system. Either of the mechanisms is possible depending upon the crosslinker used.
There are certain factors that must be considered while choosing a crosslinking agent. Cost is the main driver, but other features like ease and safety of use, performance properties expected and pot life requirements also affect the choice of the crosslinker. In our study we have evaluated four different crosslinkers, as shown in Table 2.
A clear formula was prepared for Joncryl HYB and the crosslinkers added to the formulated material at 3% and 6% based on total formula weight under agitation. Ten different combinations of PUD and crosslinker, F1-F10, were evaluated, as depicted in Table 3.
The blends of PUD and crosslinker were used immediately after mixing and cured according to the timelines in Table 4. Formulations were drawn down on Leneta 2A cards for assessing gloss, on aluminum for hardness, and on wood for chemical resistance and adhesion. The dry film thickness (DFT) for a single coat was 1.6-1.8 mils. Two coats were applied on wood with the total DFT varying from 3.2-3.6 mils.
Gloss and Hardness
Gloss for all the PUD-crosslinker blends was evaluated on Leneta 2A cards, while hardness was tested on aluminum panels using a König Pendulum Hardness tester. Results for gloss are shown in Table 5, while Figure 2 represents the hardness at day 1 and after baking at 50 °C overnight.
From Table 5, it is evident that Joncryl HYB is a high-gloss resin. Addition of the crosslinkers did not negatively impact the gloss of the coatings. In fact, a slight increase in gloss was observed in all the systems when compared to F10. Figure 2 demonstrates that hardness of the crosslinked coatings was slightly improved in systems with isocyanate or PCDI, but since Joncryl HYB is a PUD-acrylic hybrid, it has good final hardness even without using a crosslinker.
Adhesion to Wood
Adhesion was tested on maple wood following ASTM D, Method A.10 Joncryl HYB has good wet and dry adhesion to wood, and the crosslinkers did not adversely impact this property.
Stain and Chemical Resistance
Both stain and chemical resistance were tested according to ASTM D- where the coating was exposed to the chemical for a specified amount of time (1 hour if not noted). After removing the chemical, its effect on the coating was observed and the resistance was rated on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0 indicated failure and 5 indicated no effect. Stain resistance is shown in Table 6, while Table 7 has data on chemical resistance.
Goto Yourun Synthetic Material to know more.
Stain resistance of the resin as represented by F10 is good, but addition of isocyanate and PCDI in formulations F1-F5 helps to reduce degradation by stain agents, while the melamine crosslinker in F8 and F9 did not help with stain resistance. A similar trend was observed for chemical resistance where formulations F1-F5 have significantly better chemical resistance than F10. Aziridine and melamine crosslinkers did improve the resistance to chemicals but not as much as the isocyanate and PCDI.
MEK Double Rubs
Solvent resistance of the coatings was analyzed using MEK double rubs according to ASTM D- where a cheesecloth soaked in MEK was rubbed on a coated Leneta 2A card using a 1-kg weighted hammer. The number of double rubs was measured until the coating degraded. The results for the MEK double rubs are shown in Figure 3.
As seen in the graph, F10 has 20 MEK rubs but in formulations F1-F4, the number of rubs is nearly doubled when an isocyanate or PCDI (at 6%) is used as a crosslinker. The addition of the melamine formaldehyde crosslinker has the opposite effect where the number of double rubs is drastically reduced. This could be because of poor crosslinking, which affects the integrity of the film.
Impact Resistance and Flexibility
Addition of crosslinkers has been known to make coatings more brittle and susceptible to cracking. We therefore evaluated the impact resistance and flexibility of the crosslinked systems in our study. Impact resistance was measured for direct and reverse impacts, and the data is depicted in Table 8. For most of the crosslinkers, the increased crosslink density does not affect the impact resistance except with the melamine formaldehyde in F8 and F9, which makes the coating brittle and reduces the resistance for both direct and reverse impacts.
Flexibility was evaluated using a ¼' conical mandrel bend tester following ASTM D522.13 All the crosslinked systems passed the test for flexibility with no cracking observed for any of the formulations F1-F10, as seen in Figure 4. Joncryl HYB has excellent flexibility, and crosslinking does not affect the flexibility of the resin.
Taber Abrasion
Taber abrasion was measured using CS-10 stones on a Taber abrader. The amount of coating lost was measured every 250 cycles for 1,000 cycles and is presented in Figure 5. Joncryl HYB in F10 has good abrasion resistance, losing only 26 mg after 1,000 cycles. Amongst all the crosslinkers tested, addition of aziridine in F6 and F7 improves the resistance significantly. Abrasion resistance is important for applications like floor coatings, which are subjected to a lot of traffic, and this data is crucial to choose the crosslinker with the best performance properties.
Mechanism and Properties of the Crosslinkers
To try to understand the mechanism of crosslinking, IR analysis was performed using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50R FT-IR. Figure 6 shows the IR spectrum of the Joncryl HYB and the main functional groups seen in the spectrum.
The two main peaks in the spectrum are 1) a broad peak at 3,349 cm-1 that indicates an OH group in the resin and water from the formulation; 2) the carbonyl group that is the peak at 1,723 cm-1 and represents the carboxylic acid functionality in the polymer backbone.14 To understand the crosslinking mechanism, these peaks were compared to those in the crosslinked systems. Figure 7 shows the IR spectrum for the resin crosslinked with isocyanate as well as the proposed mechanism for the crosslinking.
In the IR spectrum for the system crosslinked with isocyanate, the peak at 2,100 cm-1 is absent; implying complete consumption of the isocyanate. A new carbonyl peak at 1,690 cm-1 is formed, which could represent polyurea. The carbonyl peak from the PUD is unchanged, signifying that this group was not involved in the reaction with the isocyanate. All these factors lead us to propose the mechanism shown in Figure 7, where the isocyanate reacts with water to produce polyurea, forming an interpenetrating network within the framework of the PUD.
When PCDI is used as the crosslinker, there is a shift in the OH peak of the resin. This indicates that the COOH groups on the resin have reacted with the PCDI to form a polyurea. Since the carbonyl group remains mostly unchanged, we concluded that the polyurea peaks overlap with that of the PUD C=O group. The IR spectrum and the proposed mechanism of the reaction with PCDI are shown in Figure 8.
A mechanism similar to that with the PCDI was proposed for both the aziridine and melamine formaldehyde crosslinkers based on the shifted OH peak observed in IR. Figures 9 and 10 represent the IRs and the projected mechanisms.
Four different crosslinkers were evaluated along with a PUD-acrylic hybrid to determine their performance as a crosslinker in a wood coating. Several properties were studied, and IR analysis was done to determine the crosslinking mechanism. The results for the application testing can be summarized in Figure 11. The isocyanate and PCDI provided the most significant improvement in chemical and stain resistance without affecting the flexibility of the resin. While isocyanates can be skin sensitizers, PCDI is much safer to use. PCDI as a crosslinker has a longer pot life when compared to that of the isocyanate, however, PCDI needs a higher temperature for complete cure. Excellent abrasion resistance can be achieved by aziridine, though these tend to yellow more rapidly under artificial weathering. Melamine formaldehyde is the cheapest, but in our system was a poor crosslinker and in some cases negatively affected the performance properties of the resin. It is therefore important to evaluate different crosslinkers and understand their benefits and drawbacks in a given system to enable the formulation of a high-performance wood coating.
References
1 Noble, K-L. Waterborne Polyurethanes, Progress in Organic Coatings 32, , 131-136, doi: 10./S-(97)-4.
2 Petschke, G.; Yang, S. Urethane-Acrylic Hybrid Polymer Dispersion, Patent US B1.
3 Hirosea, M.; Zhoua, J.; Nagaib, K. The Structure and Properties of Acrylic-Polyurethane Hybrid Emulsions, Progress in Organic Coatings 38, , 27-34, doi: 10./S-(99)-8.
4 Harmsen, A.S. et.al. European Coatings Journal, , 14.
5 Making a Difference with Crosslinking Technologies, Coatings Tech https://www.paint.org/article/making-difference-crosslinking-technologies/
6 Henderson, W.A.; Schultz, C.J. Journal of Organic Chemistry , 27, .
7 Vandenabeele-Trambouze, O.; Mion, L.; Garrelly, L.; Commeyras, A. Advances in Environmental Research , 6, 45.
8 Bender, M.L. Chemical Reviews , 60, 53.
9 Lucas, H.R. Interpenetrating Polymer Network Compositions' USA.
10 ASTM D-17, Standard Test Methods for Rating Adhesion by Tape Test, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, , DOI: 10./D-17, www.astm.org.
11 ASTM D-02, Standard Test Method for Effect of Household Chemicals on Clear and Pigmented Organic Finishes, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, , DOI: 10./D-02, www.astm.org.
12 ASTM D-15, Standard Practice for Assessing the Solvent Resistance of Organic Coatings Using Solvent Rubs, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, , DOI: 10./D-15, www.astm.org.
13 ASTM D522 / D522M-17, Standard Test Methods for Mandrel Bend Test of Attached Organic Coatings, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, , DOI: 10./D_DM-17, www.astm.org.
14 Silverstein, R.M.; Bassler, G.C.; Morrill, T.C. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, . QD272.S6 S55.