When considering using an oral fluid drug detection device, there are a few things you need to pay attention to. First of all, make sure it includes an indicator which helps you know when you have enough of a saliva sample for the oral test to read accurately. Also, if you have always used urine tests and aren't sure about how saliva tests stack up, rest assured, Saliva screening tests can detect substances as fast and as accurately as urine tests.
Accu-Tell are exported all over the world and different industries with quality first. Our belief is to provide our customers with more and better high value-added products. Let's create a better future together.
When you opt for an oral fluid collection device with a color indicator, the indicator color change will notify the donor that enough saliva has been collected to run the test without error. Many swab testing devices lack this special feature, so it is important to choose an oral fluid drug test kit that can make sure there is a smaller risk of false results due to insufficient specimen collection.
Compared to other drug testing methods, oral fluid testing is an easiest method to the administer; no bathroom is required to collect a specimen, and little training is required to increase accuracy.
Purchase Saliva Drug Tests&#;
An oral fluid test kit can detect up to 14 different drugs. There are many different configurations to choose from, so it really depends on what you want to test for, and how many of those on you want to screen for on the same test. Below are the drugs of abuse that can be detected within different panels of a mouth swab test:
A third-party administrator will provide the donor with the swab component of the drug test, which resembles a sponge or a lollipop.
The donor will be instructed to rub the swab against their cheeks or under their tongue until a sufficient saliva specimen is collected. This process usually takes approximately 2 minutes.
The donor will return the saturated swab to the collector. The collector will insert the swab into the collection container to run the test panels.
Wait 10 minutes. The saliva will saturate the panels to reveal the colored lines, indicating positive or negative drug test results (see below for further interpretation of results). Simple.
Oral fluid test results are easy to interpret. Negative and positive results are displayed on each drug panel with colored lines:
Negative saliva drug test
Positive saliva drug test
Some oral fluid devices are flavored to encourage saliva flow without impeding results. SalivaConfirm oral fluid test kits are equipped with a minty tip for donors who cannot produce saliva quickly. This feature expedites the turnaround time of the test itself, which may be helpful during random, on-the-spot, and post-accident drug testing.
Within minutes, the mouth swab can determine if someone has used drug(s) in the past 3-24 hours. Saliva specimens offer the shortest detection window, which is ideal for reasonable suspicion testing.
Oral fluid tests are very dependable point-of-care tests (POCT). Staffing and recruiting professionals prefer to issue oral drug test kits for candidate screening. Occupational safety managers who demand full-time sobriety can also benefit from using saliva drug tests.
However, if you do require assistance, Confirm offers training guides and whitepapers to show you how to operate your saliva drug tests. Plus, our customer service team is always here to help.
It&#;s virtually impossible to adulterate an oral fluid test kit because an unbiased collector must be present at all times during the collection procedure. Even forums that advocate for artificial saliva use do not understand the accuracy and integrity of saliva drug tests. Cheating methods that will not work include:
Want more information on Saliva Rapid Test Cassette? Feel free to contact us.
Marijuana metabolites, i.e. THC, can be detected in saliva samples for up to 24 hours, although the average detection window is 6-12 hours post-use.
As to whether CBD will show up on a drug test: the answer is no. CBD is not metabolized by the body the same way as THC, and so saliva drug tests are not calibrated to detect cannabinoid oil.
Oral Fluid Testing is the right solution if trying to screen for recent substance use, since saliva samples contain a higher percentage of the parent drug, compared to urine that measures only the by-product metabolites. Depending on the type of drug(s) used and drug cutoff levels, drug detection times for saliva drug test kits are shorter (between 6 hours and 3 days) compared to urine drug tests or hair follicle drug tests.
Oral drug test kits are very donor and administrator friendly. Oral fluid drug testing is non-invasive and allows for easy, supervised specimen collection. There is no need for the privacy of a bathroom, so it is virtually impossible to cheat a saliva drug test. Urine drug testing requires a bathroom for private specimen collection, and allows the individual the opportunity to tamper with the test.
Oral fluid testing is a great tool for employers to use at a workplace in order to facilitate a systematic drug check up ranging from pre-employment to post accident.
Find Out Which Is Best for Your Needs
With COVID-19 cases rising and new variants emerging, demand for testing remains high. The persistent demand for COVID-19 tests has caused global shortages in swabs and personal protective equipment (PPE), which must be worn by those who collect swab samples. These shortages have forced public health officials to pivot towards alternative testing methods.1,2 Although antigen tests, also known as &#;rapid tests,&#; are available, they have their drawbacks. Antibody detection from a blood sample cannot be used to detect active infections, and rapid antigen tests are generally not as sensitive as swab-based tests that use real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other forms of nucleic acid amplification.3,4 Saliva, by contrast, is gaining popularity as a swab alternative because it is easy to self-collect and less prone to supply chain disruptions. Yet one question remains: Are saliva tests as effective as nasal swabs at detecting COVID-19?
Swab-based testing is considered the gold standard for COVID-19 detection. Initially validated by the CDC as one of the first COVID-19 sample collecting methods, many people who have received a deep nasal (nasopharyngeal) swab remember the discomforting and invasive experience as one that &#;engender[s] visceral dislike,&#;5 causing fits of coughing, sneezing, and sometimes even a bloody nose. Deep nasal swabs are particularly uncomfortable and traumatizing for children. Although many online articles6,7 offer solutions for parents wishing to get their children testing by nasal swab &#; from reassurance to bringing stuffed animals for emotional support &#; the idea of their child enduring such an irritating experience has caused many parents and patients to seek out a less invasive collection procedure or avoid being tested altogether.5
Allowing patients to self-collect nasal swabs can provide a sense of comfort and control. However, this approach comes with risks because patients can injure themselves or compromise the sample. Nose bleeding, retained foreign body, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and infection are all documented complications of nasal SARS-CoV-2 testing, although the former two are far more common than the latter two.8 Additionally, if self-collection instructions are unclear, patients can accidentally place swabs into the transport medium prior and then into their nose where the reagent may be harmful. Oral swabs and shallow nasal swabs, on the other hand, can be self-administered with fewer complications generally. These self-collected swabs may help to increase the bandwidth of testing for COVID-19.
For swab-based COVID-19 testing and other pathogen surveillance applications, safety and ease-of-use can be achieved through SafeCollect Swab Collection Kits. By containing DNA/RNA Shield, a DNA/RNA stabilization reagent, under a safety seal, this swab collection device minimizes user error and allows for unsupervised collection of both oral and shallow nasal swabs. After sample collection, the swab is plunged through the safety seal into the stabilization reagent; at this point, the sample can be stored at ambient temperatures kept at room temperature for up to 30 days. Customizable user instructions can also be created by Zymo Research for better compliance in unsupervised collection settings. With direct US-based manufacturing, production capacity can be customized for each order request, ensuring access to medical equipment regardless of global supply shortages.
For many, the most notable difference between saliva and swab-based sampling is the sample collection experience. By replacing invasive swabs with drooling in a tube, saliva-based sampling allows for effortless collection minus the nose bleeds and stuffed support animals.
With saliva-based collecting methods, patient care and satisfaction come first. The non-invasive procedure can be done unsupervised, resulting in higher compliance. Most saliva collection devices involve drooling or salivating saliva into a tube up to a fill line. In addition to being pain-free, saliva-based sampling is easier and safer than a nasal swab, making the method an attractive alternative for school testing programs, targeting a critical age group for pandemic surveillance.9 With saliva testing gaining FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and clearance from the CDC, is this alternative really as accurate and sensitive as swabs?
Multiple systematic analyses have compiled data from around the world comparing the accuracy and efficacy of saliva-based swab-based methods for the detection and diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. Many have found that there is no significant difference between the two collection types, suggesting that saliva specimens may be preferred over nasal swabs due to their convenience and simplicity.9-14
One meta-analysis compared the sensitivity and cost of swab and saliva-based testing. Not only did the researchers find comparable sensitivities between both methods for detection of SARS-CoV-2, but they estimated that collection of saliva-based samples instead of nasopharyngeal swabs would save an average $6.36 for every person tested.15 That figure quickly adds up in a pandemic where hundreds of thousands to millions of tests are administered daily.16
When determining the best saliva collection device for your specific application, several design characteristics and features should be considered. First, you can eliminate the need for cold storage and shipping by choosing a collection device that uses a nucleic acid stabilization reagent. Such devices not only minimize shipping and transportation costs but remove the chance of sample integrity loss from compromised storage conditions. Additionally, having a collection device with a stabilization solution already housed within ensures the highest quality of saliva is obtained and preserved from its immediate collection time until it&#;s tested. Finally, with at-home and unsupervised sample collection becoming increasingly common, saliva collection devices must be user-friendly and prioritize not only safety but consistent sampling as well.
The foolproof design of Zymo Research&#;s SafeCollect Saliva Collection Kit has several features that make for safe and streamlined saliva sample collection:
Fully customizable user-instructions can be designed and manufactured by our team to specifically fit your application needs, guaranteeing absolute transparency and consistency in your sample collecting process.
Swabs or saliva, Zymo Research&#;s products utilize a US-based manufacturer who directly controls their own supply chain, protecting its production capacity against shortages and guaranteeing fulfillment across all orders.
If you want to learn more, please visit our website Syphilis Rapid Test Strip.